November 20, 2008
Excuse the interuption to the tales of my travels
But, I just have to share a recent email that I received by someone who is offended by my needlefelting.
On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 11:07 AM, Bryan Tankersley <email deleted> wrote:
> Hello, I am just curious about something I saw on your web site. It appears
> that your needle felted teddy bear and rabbit have “protruding parts”…???
> Is there a reason for this. It seems kind of perverted to me. Would be cute
> without making them obscene.
> Bryan
> Sent from my T-Mobile Sidekick®
My gut reaction was to respond, even though it probably would have been wiser to just delete it and move on with my life. That said, wise choices are difficult in the heat of the moment and here was my reply.
First of all, it was one animal, a polar bear. I do not find the
“protruding parts” to be obscene, it is merely bits of wool shaped
into a figurative representation. In fact, it was that precise
attention to detail that helped me get juried into the craftsman’s
guild.Secondly, I was not going for cute, I was demonstrating my skill in a
manner I found both whimsical and amusing. When you are the artist,
you can make your own choices. As for me, I would not change a thing
about that piece.
I suppose it says more about me that I felt compelled to respond to an to email complaint about my “perverted” and “obscene” needlefelting. Since there is only one such creature in my menagerie, I suppose it says more about him that he is seeing “protruding parts” where there are none. While most of my figurative animals are gender neutral, that particular one is not and I have my reasons. I get more positive response from that one item than any other, because people think it is funny. Maybe I should knit some pantaloons to cover his naughty bits…NOT!!
Comments(5)
















